04-18-2023, 07:33 PM
Active Conspiracy with smartphones, & OPSEC, I am being extremely censored & banned for politely asking a question about GrapheneOS/GooglePixel on http://www.discuss.grapheneos.org, & comparing it to open source chinese OnePlus brand, & very disturbingly got immediately & arbitrarily banned.
--Basically, my goal & question is, what is the most secure & anti-forensic smartphone there is?
And GrapheneOS/GooglePixel, comparing that to Kali Nethunter on a OnePlus smartphone, which is better/safer?
My same question & post has also been shadowbanned on 5 different reddit subs, very disturbingly, literally every place on reddit I’ve posted this same question/scrutiny about GrapheneOS/GooglePixel.
Here was my post & question:
https://pasteboard.co/EDR4vJROTfvr.png
This screenshot was the only response/reply i got on my post: https://pasteboard.co/lnB9jMLSK4SR.png
& in addition, I received a private inbox message from grapheneOS admin rudely accusing me of lying(which i wasnt) & saying I am being "indefinitely banned":
The expert I am personally in communication with,who is critical of grapheneOS & questions it, this expert saw their reply & private messaged me this:
"But when you install Kali Nethunter to the OnePlus, you get a new bootloader. But I see that wasn't mentioned by them, so that erroneously came sideways when it wasn't relevant. It's like Grub.
You don't risk your organization by not cooperating with law enforcement if you simply keep silent. For example, go onto Westlaw or LexusNexus and tell me a case where Offensive Security provided backdoor access to Kali. Or even back in the BackTrack days Smile No cases to date. Further, look at what VeraCrypt told law enforcement. They said we can't crack a proper implementation of our product, nor do we have any desire to. Whereas, in contrast, google totally cooperates with law enforcement.
–”Also, back to the bootloader not being open source. I can't tell you how many times I had to rescue somebody who was unable to reinstall windows because they dabbled in Linux, and were unfamiliar with Grub Bootloader. Likewise, when you install Kali Linux Nethunter to a phone on the nethunter page, which is tailored for that phone, you have a new bootloader that comes with it. Just like a computer. So that's why the triggerhappy ban slingers...the radical left...really contributed nothing of substance in their reply. Sounds like they would rather use a Google OS which is NOT open source or free to audit, than an open source, peer audited, hacker OS. You reckon?"
Lastly, here is an interesting provider of anti forensic smartphones & laptops, dont know much about them tho:
https://adhoc.zone/
--Basically, my goal & question is, what is the most secure & anti-forensic smartphone there is?
And GrapheneOS/GooglePixel, comparing that to Kali Nethunter on a OnePlus smartphone, which is better/safer?
My same question & post has also been shadowbanned on 5 different reddit subs, very disturbingly, literally every place on reddit I’ve posted this same question/scrutiny about GrapheneOS/GooglePixel.
Here was my post & question:
https://pasteboard.co/EDR4vJROTfvr.png
This screenshot was the only response/reply i got on my post: https://pasteboard.co/lnB9jMLSK4SR.png
& in addition, I received a private inbox message from grapheneOS admin rudely accusing me of lying(which i wasnt) & saying I am being "indefinitely banned":
The expert I am personally in communication with,who is critical of grapheneOS & questions it, this expert saw their reply & private messaged me this:
"But when you install Kali Nethunter to the OnePlus, you get a new bootloader. But I see that wasn't mentioned by them, so that erroneously came sideways when it wasn't relevant. It's like Grub.
You don't risk your organization by not cooperating with law enforcement if you simply keep silent. For example, go onto Westlaw or LexusNexus and tell me a case where Offensive Security provided backdoor access to Kali. Or even back in the BackTrack days Smile No cases to date. Further, look at what VeraCrypt told law enforcement. They said we can't crack a proper implementation of our product, nor do we have any desire to. Whereas, in contrast, google totally cooperates with law enforcement.
–”Also, back to the bootloader not being open source. I can't tell you how many times I had to rescue somebody who was unable to reinstall windows because they dabbled in Linux, and were unfamiliar with Grub Bootloader. Likewise, when you install Kali Linux Nethunter to a phone on the nethunter page, which is tailored for that phone, you have a new bootloader that comes with it. Just like a computer. So that's why the triggerhappy ban slingers...the radical left...really contributed nothing of substance in their reply. Sounds like they would rather use a Google OS which is NOT open source or free to audit, than an open source, peer audited, hacker OS. You reckon?"
Lastly, here is an interesting provider of anti forensic smartphones & laptops, dont know much about them tho:
https://adhoc.zone/